Implications for the Future

Communities around the world face contamination problems on cardinal level or a nonher. Pollution exists in a round of forms, including noise, air, land, weewee supply, indoor, and outdoor. Humans ar affected by contaminant both physically and emotionally through the effect on the environment and physical wellness. The breeding blood of the community is the piss source, whether it comes from a river, well, or urine give-and- select over plant. The excogitation of this paper is to review wiz befoulment problem confront by a community, how the problem affects the psychological wellness of the community and settle a solution to that problem.The chosen topic for this paper is water fake which bequeath include the defilement problem of water harbour, the effects on military mans, conservation techniques, and barriers to solving the problem. Psychology and the Preservation of the Environment A various relationship exists between psychology and the preservation of the environment. The world of psychology covers an passing huge realm, which is full of different argonas and much information. Inside this realm is the whimsey of the environment, which surrounds gay beings.The word environment is composed of diverse concepts and possesses an highly salient definition or usher out be quite specific. Certain examples of environments ar institutions, office or event buildings, or family settings, to name just a few (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995). Resources adjudge grown little available over the years. When comp atomic form 18d to more than than years ago when resources analogous water were in abundance and human beings did non need to resuscitate themselves with running out of this resource, today water and other resources ar revealing signs of extreme reduction.This indicates that if the cosmos does not formulate to conserve these resources, they could evaporate ultimately. One principal(prenominal) relationship or corporation between psychology and preservation is carriage. Human beings be ca-ca in a certain manner, which is influenced by their capability and exitingness. These demeanors can possess an effect on the preservation of the natural environment. Nevertheless(prenominal), a human beings behavior can be altered to fit the needs of other individuals (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995).The principal(prenominal) component of this behavior alteration is the motivation of the human being because if bulk do not yearn to fit their behavior, the essential behavior changes pull up stakes not take place (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995). The following is an example of the need for holdative behavior for the occurrence of water conservation. If a human being possesses a walloping swimming pool, he or she will most probable be adding water on a normal basis to go along water in the pool and to forbid it clean.In addition cleaning and substitute filthy water for clean water is an excellent way to save a sanitary swimm ing pool. However, certain individuals exist who quickly fill their swimming pools with more water once a small meat is splashed out. When a decrease in water availability exists, a human being must alter his or her behavior to extend water. Furthermore, an individual must be willing to desist from make fulling his or her water when this happens. This involves certain behavior alterations, which if an individual can achieve can create a huge contri thation to his or her environment.However, if an individual does not change his or her behavior, the government body that observes the accessibility of water will need to create a decision regarding how to decrease the water consumption. legion(predicate) relinquishs regarding preserving and conserving the environment possess a focus throughout psychology. As the race evolves and human beings help to protect the environment, people in the intended environment will begin to adapt (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995). Young children will learn to deliver water and other natural resources.Furthermore, the generation of these young children will adapt easier comp ard to their p arnts who crawl iningly had to change their behavior to follow the natural resources within their environment. solving for wet Pollutants Community and Factory event In 1972, the Federal water supply Pollution Control Act that is now live onn as the scour Water Act (CWA) was formed (NPDES. 2011). What this act was to ensure is that there atomic number 18 regulations put in place for the pollutants entering the water from point sources in the United States.Industries argon attached a limit of how much and how they be disposing of harmful chemicals that will either go directly into the water or into sources that will r all(prenominal) water supplies (NPDES. 2011). Rules, limits, regulations as well as permits ar needed for disposal of toxins (NPDES. 2011). Workplaces, factories, and manufacturing plants guide been attractived, beside s sedate continue to unloosen harmful toxins that go against the regulations of the CWA (Dissenting, 2000). The cope with this is that the problem keep mum arises and many a(prenominal) of these places ar not punished for the crimes they argon committing (Dissenting, 2000).As of this time the penalties atomic number 18 a handsome of between $5,000 and $50,000 a day as well as but not necessarily, including possible jail time of no more than troika years (Dissenting, 2000). Penalties need to be more extensive with laws that to a fault resign that after so many offenses that the factories atomic number 18 shut down with a possible permanent pass removal. It would alike be feasible to flummox the fines start at the $5,000 to $50,000 a day but have them go up a percentage each(prenominal) day or a larger percentage weekly, however, not to exceed a number of eld without loss of licensing and permit loss.Second offense would be the same although time that elapses without manifest or permit is to be extended. Personal or Household resolve Many brands argon labeling their products as green (Yu, 2010, April). It is difficult to know what one is buying when he or she flips to the back of a product and still many of the ingredients be unrecognizable. Many people will remunerate more money for products in the hopes of buying a product that will be better for the environment, themselves, and family. Federal regulation at this time expresses leniency on companies using the word green in their products (Yu, 2010, April).Some companies argon using phrases kindred nontoxic such as Simple Green, although the products still contain chemicals that ar put in to cause red cell misuse and even generative issues in animals (Yu, 2010, April). Other companies ar using the term green, and this actually essence in the product is that they are using the least toxic chemicals ground in the group which the chemicals are classified under (Yu, 2010, April). Ther e are many simple tricks, or products people whitethorn use that they by and large have lying around the house.This will ensure that the people know whatproducts they are using and know that the toxins are not in what they are using. Here are some helpful tips. Bathtubs, Floors, and hard to scrub areas (baking keynote with vinegar) Cutting Boards and Counters (Hot water and vinegar) Furniture (Microfiber cloth dampened) Polished Furniture (A systematic cloth and an oil base, such as olive oil or even a citrus oil) Windows (isopropyl alcohol, water, and vinegar) Air Freshener (Water, baking dada, and lemon or even fabric softener) Mold (one part peroxide to two part water let sit for one hour) Barriers to the firmnessBig corporations, manufacturing companies, and utilities have been addicted a set of rules and regulations to follow when the use and disposal of chemicals are involved. Often penalties have been follow outd for disregarding regulations and the discovery of illeg al dumping however, this has not stop the problem. Enforcing the regulations and ensuring consecratements of the fines given has proven to be a difficult task. Political lobbyist employ by the corporations have helped to protect the interests of the companies by effectively check the kernel of the fines and helped to create legal loop holes to avoid paying those fines.The legal battles which whitethorn be successfully brought before a court can take years to win and with the pecuniary resources on the side of corporations the cases sometimes neer make it into court. In addition the sum of the fine is often easier to pay so the companies can go about their business. Increasing regulations and raising the limits on the fines could be beneficial but difficult to achieve because of the political accomplishment of hire lobbyist. Outcome and Justification Water pollution is a proficient problem that is affecting the environment in multiple ways. By limiting the inwardness of po llution, the environment whitethorn be asseverated.Behavior adjustment techniques can put on proper waste control and proper chemical use. To preserve the environment, harsher punishments are suggested for companies that violate the regulations of the snowy Water Act. Fines are currently at a flat rate per violation. A suggested natural action is to increase the fine until the regulations are followed. In the case that regulations are continually violated, companies should face loss of license. These suggestions may prove difficult to enforce because of legal and political barriers. Household pollution can be limited by changing the use of products.Some products are misleading in advertisements and claims phrases such as green and non-toxic do not always mean chemical free. These types of products can cause severe stultification to the environment, animals, and people. Behavior modification is the basis behind the suggestions to reduce and prevent water pollution in both indu strial environments and in the household. Behavior modification relies on the concept of condition (Sullivan, 2009). Behaviorism was based on the mentation that individuals had no free will and all actions could be explained using stimuli and responses.Operant learn modifies behavior through rewards and punishment. To encourage a behavior, a reward is offered upon termination of the behavior (Sullivan, 2009). To reduce a behavior, a punishment is given upon each occurrence of the undesired behavior. Using rewards and punishments, behavior can be modified. In this short letter, behavior can be modified to reduce pollution (Sullivan, 2009). In the case of companies violating regulations of the Clean Water Act, a punishment would be given with each violation. If the insensibility of the punishment is sufficient, the behavior will be less probable to occur again.The motif behind increasing the fines is that increasing the virulence of the punishment will decrease the likelihood of repeat behavior. In the short letter of chemical use and pollution in the household, rewards may be utilize to modify behavior. Suggested alternatives to harmful chemicals are less costly and simple to use. Benefits also include a sense of health safety when harsh chemicals are not present. The fiscal reward of not buying chemicals and less fill for health may increase the likelihood of using home remedies kinda than chemical filled products.Small changes can create differences in actions and the influence on the environment. Behavior modification regarding water pollution may reduce pollution and preserve the environment. Conclusion Pollution plagues communities around the world affecting health and the environment. Identifying pollution problems, their causes, and solutions is the key to preserving the future for the next generations. Water is a fate for every living organism on the planet and clean imbibition water is a must for humans and animals alike.Once the target p ollution issue has been identified, creating a performanceable solution that can be accomplished by all those in the community is the next important step. Every voltage solution may have various barriers to overcome, such as political, legal, and financial considerations. Political barriers, such as corporate lobbyist are likely to be a problem. However, environmental lobbyists are helping to fight solutions to pollution and the violate it is doing to the earth and humans. The implications for the future are not very promising without painstaking changes individually and communally.Implications for the FutureCommunities around the world face pollution problems on one level or another. Pollution exists in a number of forms, including noise, air, land, water, indoor, and outdoor. Humans are affected by pollution both physically and emotionally through the effect on the environment and physical health. The conduct blood of the community is the water source, whether it comes from a river, well, or water interposition plant. The purpose of this paper is to review one pollution problem confront by a community, how the problem affects the psychological health of the community and purpose a solution to that problem.The chosen topic for this paper is water control which will include the pollution problem of water control, the effects on humans, conservation techniques, and barriers to solving the problem. Psychology and the Preservation of the Environment A diverse relationship exists between psychology and the preservation of the environment. The world of psychology covers an extremely huge realm, which is full of different areas and much information. Inside this realm is the thought of the environment, which surrounds human beings.The word environment is composed of diverse concepts and possesses an extremely large definition or can be quite specific. Certain examples of environments are institutions, office or event buildings, or family settings, to name just a few (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995). Resources have grown less available over the years. When compared to many years ago when resources like water were in abundance and human beings did not need to concern themselves with running out of this resource, today water and other resources are revealing signs of extreme reduction.This indicates that if the population does not work to conserve these resources, they could evaporate ultimately. One main relationship or confederacy between psychology and preservation is behavior. Human beings behave in a certain manner, which is influenced by their capability and willingness. These behaviors can possess an effect on the preservation of the natural environment. Nevertheless, a human beings behavior can be altered to fit the needs of other individuals (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995).The main component of this behavior modification is the motivation of the human being because if people do not yearn to adapt their behavior, the essential behavior changes w ill not take place (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995). The following is an example of the need for accommodative behavior for the occurrence of water conservation. If a human being possesses a large swimming pool, he or she will most likely be adding water on a normal basis to keep water in the pool and to keep it clean.In addition cleaning and regenerate filthy water for clean water is an excellent way to have a sanitary swimming pool. However, certain individuals exist who quickly refill their swimming pools with more water once a small make sense is splashed out. When a decrease in water availability exists, a human being must alter his or her behavior to preserve water. Furthermore, an individual must be willing to desist from refilling his or her water when this happens. This involves certain behavior alterations, which if an individual can achieve can create a huge contribution to his or her environment.However, if an individual does not change his or her behavior, the government b ody that observes the accessibility of water will need to create a decision regarding how to decrease the water consumption. numerous issues regarding preserving and conserving the environment possess a focus throughout psychology. As the population evolves and human beings help to protect the environment, people in the intended environment will begin to adapt (Veitch & Arkkelin, 1995). Young children will learn to preserve water and other natural resources.Furthermore, the generation of these young children will adapt easier compared to their parents who knowingly had to change their behavior to preserve the natural resources within their environment. Solution for Water Pollutants Community and Factory Solution In 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act that is now known as the Clean Water Act (CWA) was formed (NPDES. 2011). What this act was to ensure is that there are regulations put in place for the pollutants entering the water from point sources in the United States.Indu stries are given a limit of how much and how they are disposing of harmful chemicals that will either go directly into the water or into sources that will reach water supplies (NPDES. 2011). Rules, limits, regulations as well as permits are needed for disposal of toxins (NPDES. 2011). Workplaces, factories, and manufacturing plants have been fined, but still continue to disoblige harmful toxins that go against the regulations of the CWA (Dissenting, 2000). The issue with this is that the problem still arises and many of these places are not punished for the crimes they are committing (Dissenting, 2000).As of this time the penalties are a fine of between $5,000 and $50,000 a day as well as but not necessarily, including possible jail time of no more than threesome years (Dissenting, 2000). Penalties need to be more extensive with laws that also arouse that after so many offenses that the factories are shut down with a possible permanent license removal. It would also be feasible t o have the fines start at the $5,000 to $50,000 a day but have them go up a percentage each day or a larger percentage weekly, however, not to exceed a number of age without loss of licensing and permit loss.Second offense would be the same although time that elapses without license or permit is to be extended. Personal or Household Solution Many brands are labeling their products as green (Yu, 2010, April). It is difficult to know what one is buying when he or she flips to the back of a product and still many of the ingredients are unrecognizable. Many people will pay more money for products in the hopes of buying a product that will be better for the environment, themselves, and family. Federal regulation at this time expresses leniency on companies using the word green in their products (Yu, 2010, April).Some companies are using phrases like nontoxic such as Simple Green, although the products still contain chemicals that are found to cause red cell impairment and even reproduc tive issues in animals (Yu, 2010, April). Other companies are using the term green, and this actually center in the product is that they are using the least toxic chemicals found in the group which the chemicals are classified under (Yu, 2010, April). There are many simple tricks, or products people may use that they generally have lying around the house.This will ensure that the people know whatproducts they are using and know that the toxins are not in what they are using. Here are some helpful tips. Bathtubs, Floors, and hard to scrub areas (baking soda with vinegar) Cutting Boards and Counters (Hot water and vinegar) Furniture (Microfiber cloth dampened) Polished Furniture (A steady cloth and an oil base, such as olive oil or even a citrus oil) Windows (isopropyl alcohol, water, and vinegar) Air Freshener (Water, baking soda, and lemon or even fabric softener) Mold (one part peroxide to two part water let sit for one hour) Barriers to the SolutionBig corporations, manufactur ing companies, and utilities have been given a set of rules and regulations to follow when the use and disposal of chemicals are involved. Often penalties have been enforced for disregarding regulations and the discovery of illegal dumping however, this has not stop the problem. Enforcing the regulations and ensuring payments of the fines given has proven to be a difficult task. Political lobbyist hired by the corporations have helped to protect the interests of the companies by effectively limiting the amount of the fines and helped to create legal loop holes to avoid paying those fines.The legal battles which may be successfully brought before a court can take years to win and with the financial resources on the side of corporations the cases sometimes never make it into court. In addition the sum of the fine is often easier to pay so the companies can go about their business. Increasing regulations and raising the limits on the fines could be beneficial but difficult to achieve b ecause of the political action of hired lobbyist. Outcome and Justification Water pollution is a overserious problem that is affecting the environment in multiple ways. By limiting the amount of pollution, the environment may be preserved.Behavior modification techniques can enforce proper waste control and proper chemical use. To preserve the environment, harsher punishments are suggested for companies that violate the regulations of the Clean Water Act. Fines are currently at a flat rate per violation. A suggested action is to increase the fine until the regulations are followed. In the case that regulations are continually violated, companies should face loss of license. These suggestions may prove difficult to enforce because of legal and political barriers. Household pollution can be limited by changing the use of products.Some products are misleading in advertisements and claims phrases such as green and non-toxic do not always mean chemical free. These types of products can cause severe damage to the environment, animals, and people. Behavior modification is the basis behind the suggestions to reduce and prevent water pollution in both industrial environments and in the household. Behavior modification relies on the concept of conditioning (Sullivan, 2009). Behaviorism was based on the idea that individuals had no free will and all actions could be explained using stimuli and responses.Operant conditioning modifies behavior through rewards and punishment. To encourage a behavior, a reward is offered upon extent of the behavior (Sullivan, 2009). To reduce a behavior, a punishment is given upon each occurrence of the undesired behavior. Using rewards and punishments, behavior can be modified. In this situation, behavior can be modified to reduce pollution (Sullivan, 2009). In the case of companies violating regulations of the Clean Water Act, a punishment would be given with each violation. If the severity of the punishment is sufficient, the behavior w ill be less likely to occur again.The idea behind increasing the fines is that increasing the severity of the punishment will decrease the likelihood of repeat behavior. In the situation of chemical use and pollution in the household, rewards may be use to modify behavior. Suggested alternatives to harmful chemicals are less costly and simple to use. Benefits also include a sense of health safety when harsh chemicals are not present. The financial reward of not buying chemicals and less concern for health may increase the likelihood of using home remedies alternatively than chemical filled products.Small changes can create differences in actions and the influence on the environment. Behavior modification regarding water pollution may reduce pollution and preserve the environment. Conclusion Pollution plagues communities around the world affecting health and the environment. Identifying pollution problems, their causes, and solutions is the key to preserving the future for the next generations. Water is a destiny for every living organism on the planet and clean beverage water is a must for humans and animals alike.Once the target pollution issue has been identified, creating a workable solution that can be accomplished by all those in the community is the next important step. Every dominance solution may have various barriers to overcome, such as political, legal, and financial considerations. Political barriers, such as corporate lobbyist are likely to be a problem. However, environmental lobbyists are helping to fight solutions to pollution and the damage it is doing to the earth and humans. The implications for the future are not very promising without scrupulous changes individually and communally.